A YNAB alternative: what changes when you budget in euros

Let us start with what is true: YNAB is very good software. The method is sound, the interface is mature, and a fair amount of what Arca does owes something to it. If YNAB works for you, there is no reason to switch.

This article is for the people it does not work for — and in Europe, the reasons are quite specific.

The three European frictions

Billing is in US dollars. YNAB costs $14.99 a month or $109 a year, with a 34-day trial. The amount is not converted: your card is charged at the day’s exchange rate, plus whatever foreign-transaction fee your bank applies. The real cost therefore moves month to month, which is a particular irony for a budgeting tool.

Bank sync is uneven outside North America. It is powered by Plaid, whose coverage is excellent in the US and Canada and patchier in the UK and the EU. Many European users end up importing files anyway — which is precisely the manual mode they were paying to avoid.

Data is not end-to-end encrypted. That is not an accusation, it is an architectural property shared by nearly every budgeting app: to categorise your transactions on the server, the server has to read them. It is a coherent choice. It is simply not ours.

What you should not change

The method.

YNAB’s four rules — give every euro a job, embrace your true expenses, roll with the punches, age your money — are good, and switching tools is no reason to drop them. They are independent of any software: we cover them in envelope budgeting applied to a real budget.

The classic mistake when leaving YNAB is landing on a plain expense tracker. You gain convenience and lose the entire point.

The three families of alternatives

Method Bank connection End-to-end encrypted Published price
YNAB Envelopes (zero-based) Yes, via Plaid No $14.99/mo · $109/yr
Actual Budget (self-hosted) Envelopes (zero-based) Depends on setup Optional Free, MIT licence
Aggregators (Bankin’, Linxo…) Tracking and categorisation Yes, by design No Free and paid tiers
Arca Envelopes (zero-based) No Yes, by default Not announced — free beta

Aggregators are excellent for seeing where money goes, and they are built for their local market. They are not envelope budgeting tools: they describe the past rather than allocate the present. If your need is “understand my spending”, they do that better than YNAB.

Actual Budget is the obvious choice if you can run a server. MIT licence, self-hostable in a Docker container, optional end-to-end encryption, QIF/OFX/QFX/CSV imports. It is free as in software — not as in time: a machine, backups and updates are on you. For some that is a pleasure; for others it is a dealbreaker.

Arca targets the remaining third: full envelope budgeting, hosted by us, end-to-end encrypted by default, with nothing to administer.

What Arca cannot do

A comparison where the author always wins is worthless. At the time of writing:

How to choose, in three questions

Is your bank well covered by YNAB? If yes and the price does not bother you, stay. Genuinely.

Are you willing to enter or import transactions? If not, take an aggregator and give up envelopes; the two together do not exist in an end-to-end encrypted model.

Do you want to run a server? If yes, Actual Budget is hard to beat. If no, but privacy matters, that is Arca’s slot.

Further reading

Sources